a m s h e

too cool to live, too cute to die

amy. 26. florida.

earthdad:

the rise and fall

basecoat-topcoat:

EYE IN THE SKY - P.O.T.W. - OCC - technopagan

  • OCC - technopagan
  • Essie - bikini so teeny
  • Revlon - espresso + 1,000 volts
  • L’Oreal - royalty reinvented + lacey lilac
  • Sally Hansen - white on
  • Color Club - je ne sais quoi + first looks
  • half round gold beads

This is the first look using Obsessive Compulsive Cosmetics - technopagan,  

I asked my ex, now good friend, if she would ever have an open relationship and she said, “No, I don’t think I could do that” then after a pause and a smile, “but what about love affair friendships?” She went on to describe an impenetrable fortress of female friendship, her own group of best mates who’d known each other since school and had supported and loved each other through almost all of their lifetimes. They sounded far more bonded to, and in love with one another, than their respective husbands. It struck me that we don’t have the language to reflect the diversity and breadth of connections we experience. Why is sex the thing we tend to define a relationship by, when in fact it can be simple casual fun without a deep emotional transaction? Why do we say “just friends” when, for some of us, a friendship goes deeper? Can we define a new currency of commitment that celebrates and values this? Instead of having multiple confusing interpretations of the same word, could we have different words? What if we viewed our relationships as a pyramid structure with our primary partner at the top and a host of lovers, friends, spiritual soul mates, colleagues, and acquaintances beneath that?

— Rosie Wilby, “You’re More Polyamorous Than You Think” (via foutue)

awwww-cute:

BFF

😍😍😍 griev0r

Pablo Picasso

Beyoncé x Bangs

loving this

SH